A story about the life and death of one of Russia’s most ambiguous figures—Grigory Rasputin—grows under Pikul’s pen into a large-scale, captivating narrative about perhaps the most paradoxical period for our country: the brief pause between two revolutions (1905 and February…)
It first appeared in print (in an abridged form) in 1979 under the title “On the Very Last Line” in the journal “Our Contemporary” (NN4-7).
Valentin Pikul considered “The Unclean Power” the main success in his literary biography. But this novel had a very complicated fate. Here is how the author himself recalled it: “I remember that even before I began writing this book, I had already started receiving filthy anonymous letters warning me that for writing about Rasputin, I’d be dealt with. The threats said: you can write about anything you want, but only don’t touch Grigory Rasputin and his best friends.”
In any case, the novel was written and published as a separate book before its stand-alone release—it was published in “Our Contemporary,” but under a different title and with such abbreviations that it was simply impossible to judge it from these fragments. However, even those small excerpts were enough for the then leadership of the country headed by L.I. Brezhnev to see in scenes of corruption at the court of Nicholas II… themselves. And this led to the novel and the author’s name being surrounded by a “vacuum of ominous silence.”
In Pikul’s creative career, work on the novel “The Unclean Power” became a very important stage. But in his personal life it was a catastrophically difficult time, leaving deep traces—both as scars that never truly healed until the end of his life. According to Valentin Savvich, he worked his way toward this novel for more than ten years. How much material had to be “sorted through”! Not counting the small newspaper and magazine notes he read by the hundreds, the “list of literature lying on the author’s desk,” added to the manuscript, included 128 titles.
For “The Unclean Power,” there were two reviews—different in form and content, but similar in their categorical rejection of the book. “The manuscript of V. Pikul’s novel ‘The Unclean Power’ cannot be accepted for publication because… it is an expanded argument for the notorious thesis: the people have the rulers they deserve. And that is offensive to the great people, to the great country”—as the editorial conclusion put it. That’s how the burial of “The Unclean Power” took place.”